HostUSDT.E vs AUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT.E (Avalanche) vs AUSD (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
USDT.E vs AUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| USDT.E | AUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $0.9994 |
| Market cap | $17.76M | $234.29M |
| 24h volume | $114.28K | $322.55K |
| Liquidity | $674.80K | $2.82M |
| FDV | $17.76M | $162.22M |
| Holders | 95,481 | 10,320 |
| Age (days) | 1,250 | 300 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- AUSD measures ~13× the market cap of USDT.E
- AUSD measures ~4.2× the liquidity of USDT.E
- AUSD measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of USDT.E
- USDT.E measures ~9.3× the holder count of AUSD
What the data says
USDT.E
USDT.e at 0xc7198437980c041c805a1edcba50c1ce5db95118 is the legacy bridged Tether on Avalanche — the Avalanche Bridge's dollar claim that predates the issuer's own deployment on the chain. The native sibling files on its own page in this index at a far younger record; this contract is the elder book, 1,250 days into it at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The snapshot prices a $17.8 million market cap on 17.7 million units — the remains of a liquidity base that mostly migrated to the native mint. Tracked depth of $674.8 thousand is workable for that size on $209.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a modest but honest book, the shape a superseded claim settles into.
AUSD
AUSD is Agora's institutional dollar — a stablecoin built for treasury-grade backing (State Street custodian, VanEck management) that targets the same regulated-treasury ground as USDC and PYUSD. The deployment 0x00000000efe302beaa2b3e6e1b18d08d69a9012a is the Monad deployment — the same multichain address AUSD uses on every chain it lands on; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AUSD competes on custody pedigree rather than yield gimmicks — which means its risk profile is the boring kind (issuer solvency, attestation cadence, redemption terms) that is easier to verify but no smaller for being verifiable. AUSD also exists on Solana under a different mint; this Monad deployment carries the same canonical multichain address as its siblings.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT.E or AUSD?
By tracked market cap: USDT.E (Avalanche) measures $17.76M and AUSD (Monad) measures $234.29M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT.E or AUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT.E (Avalanche) grades B and AUSD (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT.E and AUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show USDT.E at −0.30% and AUSD at −0.00%.
More comparisons
USDT.E vs B3USDT.E vs RAINUSDT.E vs SANCUMBRA vs USDT.EUB vs AUSDAUSD vs SOLAUSD vs MSETHNPC vs AUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.