HostUSDC vs USD0++ — price, size and safety, side by side
USDC (BNB Chain) vs USD0++ (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
USDC vs USD0++ — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| USDC | USD0++ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.7631 | $0.9731 |
| Market cap | $11 | — |
| 24h volume | $126.92M | $4.15 |
| Liquidity | $1.38B | $5.46M |
| FDV | $38.16B | $504.34M |
| Holders | 2,778 | 2,713 |
| Age (days) | 262 | 528 |
| Safety grade | E | B |
Where they differ
- USDC measures ~252× the liquidity of USD0++
- USDC measures ~30,580,618× the 24h volume of USD0++
- over the shared window USDC moved −23.7% while USD0++ moved −0.76%
What the data says
USDC
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on USDC to flag. The mint and freeze levers on USDC's contract is still live as of 2026-09-27, leaving the deployer able to create new supply or freeze transfers for now. Until that changes, USDC stays around 37/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
Here's where USDC stands today: $1.38B of on-chain liquidity, 2,778 wallets holding and 262 days old as of 2026-09-27. Against roughly $11 in market cap, the $1.38B of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 2,778-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Treat the creator's holdings as the headline risk: 72.5% of USDC's supply sits in the deployer's wallet as of 2026-09-27, well past the 'no single holder over 5%' line the scanners use.
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $5.5 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDC or USD0++?
By tracked market cap: USDC (BNB Chain) measures $11 and USD0++ (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDC or USD0++?
On the contract checks we publish: USDC (BNB Chain) grades E and USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDC and USD0++ performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show USDC at −23.7% and USD0++ at −0.76%.
More comparisons
CCV vs USDCRDK vs USDCUSDC vs SOLUSDC vs WETHUSD0++ vs SDAIUSD0++ vs STLINKMOG vs USD0++USD0++ vs ZEC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.