HostUSDC vs AIPF — price, size and safety, side by side
USDC (BNB Chain) vs AIPF (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
USDC vs AIPF — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| USDC | AIPF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.7631 | $0.5433 |
| Market cap | $11 | $43.04M |
| 24h volume | $126.92M | $734.33K |
| Liquidity | $1.38B | $3.83M |
| FDV | $38.16B | $43.07M |
| Holders | 2,778 | 41,487 |
| Age (days) | 262 | 306 |
| Safety grade | E | B |
Where they differ
- AIPF measures ~3,912,592× the market cap of USDC
- USDC measures ~360× the liquidity of AIPF
- USDC measures ~173× the 24h volume of AIPF
- AIPF measures ~15× the holder count of USDC
- over the shared window USDC moved −6.99% while AIPF moved +31.2%
What the data says
USDC
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on USDC to flag. The mint and freeze levers on USDC's contract is still live as of 2026-09-27, leaving the deployer able to create new supply or freeze transfers for now. Until that changes, USDC stays around 37/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
Here's where USDC stands today: $1.38B of on-chain liquidity, 2,778 wallets holding and 262 days old as of 2026-09-27. Against roughly $11 in market cap, the $1.38B of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 2,778-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Treat the creator's holdings as the headline risk: 72.5% of USDC's supply sits in the deployer's wallet as of 2026-09-27, well past the 'no single holder over 5%' line the scanners use.
AIPF
AIPF at 0x2c72d25530191ebd244eb6325e1892480b0e6e28 — styled AI Powered Finance — is a Polygon-native asset 306 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $43.0 million market cap across 75.9 million units.
The book is the strongest structural read in this batch: $3.8 million of tracked pool depth is deep relative to the cap — a pool that can absorb real exits — on $361.8 thousand of 24-hour volume, a tape that actually trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a question for the live scan rather than an assumption this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDC or AIPF?
By tracked market cap: USDC (BNB Chain) measures $11 and AIPF (Polygon) measures $43.04M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDC or AIPF?
On the contract checks we publish: USDC (BNB Chain) grades E and AIPF (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDC and AIPF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show USDC at −6.99% and AIPF at +31.2%.
More comparisons
CCV vs USDCRDK vs USDCUSDC vs SOLUSDC vs WETHAIPF vs WSTETHAIPF vs PNUTAIPF vs WSTETHAIPF vs PST
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.