HostUSDC.E vs WBTC.E — price, size and safety, side by side
USDC.E (Gnosis) vs WBTC.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
USDC.E vs WBTC.E — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| USDC.E | WBTC.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.997 | $64.66K |
| Market cap | $8.54M | $22.96M |
| 24h volume | $1.32M DEX | $15.19K all venues |
| Liquidity | $3.00M | $295.75K |
| FDV | $8.61M | $22.96M |
| Holders | 7,909 | 8,992 |
| Age (days) | 521 | 1,820 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC.E measures ~2.7× the market cap of USDC.E
- USDC.E measures ~10× the liquidity of WBTC.E
- USDC.E measures ~87× the 24h volume of WBTC.E
- over the shared window USDC.E moved −0.32% while WBTC.E moved −21.8%
What the data says
USDC.E
One detail on USDC.E didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, USDC.E carries $3.18M of on-chain liquidity, 7,909 wallets holding and an established record at 521 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $9.84M in market cap, the $3.18M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 7,909-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of USDC.E as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
WBTC.E
WBTC.E at 0x50b7545627a5162f82a992c33b87adc75187b218 is the legacy bridge's wrapped bitcoin on Avalanche — the ".e" suffix marking the original Avalanche Bridge mint, distinguished from the newer BTC.b deployment — 1,820 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $23.0 million market cap on 315 local units.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $295.7 thousand of tracked depth on $165.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling near half itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDC.E or WBTC.E?
By tracked market cap: USDC.E (Gnosis) measures $8.54M and WBTC.E (Avalanche) measures $22.96M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDC.E or WBTC.E?
On the contract checks we publish: USDC.E (Gnosis) grades B and WBTC.E (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDC.E and WBTC.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show USDC.E at −0.32% and WBTC.E at −21.8%.
More comparisons
USDC.E vs ARBASTER vs USDC.EXRP vs USDC.EDRV vs USDC.EVIRTUAL vs WBTC.EGOHOME vs WBTC.ECRV vs WBTC.EWBTC.E vs ICP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.