NexUP vs PEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
UP (BNB Chain) vs PEAR (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-14.
UP vs PEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| UP | PEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1384 | $0.01663 |
| Market cap | $22.55M | $9.46M |
| 24h volume | $35.73M all venues | $52.31K all venues |
| Liquidity | $340.54K | $929.51 |
| FDV | $94.40M | $15.68M |
| Holders | 9,942 | 2,431 |
| Age (days) | 139 | 740 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- UP measures ~2.4× the market cap of PEAR
- UP measures ~366× the liquidity of PEAR
- UP measures ~683× the 24h volume of PEAR
- UP measures ~4.1× the holder count of PEAR
- over the shared window UP moved −59.4% while PEAR moved −50.7%
What the data says
UP
UP at 0x000008d2175f9aeaddb2430c26f8a6f73c5a0000 — Unitas, on a contract padded with zeros at both ends — is a 124-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $22.6 million market cap against a $94.4 million fully-diluted figure on 904.1 million units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $340.5 thousand of tracked depth on $19.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
PEAR
PEAR at 0x3212dc0f8c834e4de893532d27cc9b6001684db0 is an Arbitrum asset 725 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $9.5 million market cap with a $15.7 million fully-diluted figure on 852.2 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is workable for the cap: $929.5 of tracked depth on $58.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that clears ordinary size and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UP or PEAR?
By tracked market cap: UP (BNB Chain) measures $22.55M and PEAR (Arbitrum) measures $9.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UP or PEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: UP (BNB Chain) grades A and PEAR (Arbitrum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UP and PEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show UP at −59.4% and PEAR at −50.7%.
More comparisons
CRV vs UPUP vs GOHOMEUP vs VIRTUALMON vs UPPEAR vs NODAPEAR vs BNSOLPEAR vs JITOSOLPEAR vs JLUSDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.