NexUP vs ESP — price, size and safety, side by side
UP (BNB Chain) vs ESP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-15.
UP vs ESP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| UP | ESP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1384 | $0.07196 |
| Market cap | $22.55M | $55.11M |
| 24h volume | $35.73M all venues | $2.77M all venues |
| Liquidity | $340.54K | $1.50K |
| FDV | $94.40M | $5.85M |
| Holders | 9,942 | 3,444 |
| Age (days) | 139 | 237 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~2.4× the market cap of UP
- UP measures ~227× the liquidity of ESP
- UP measures ~13× the 24h volume of ESP
- UP measures ~2.9× the holder count of ESP
- over the shared window UP moved −59.4% while ESP moved −18.0%
What the data says
UP
UP at 0x000008d2175f9aeaddb2430c26f8a6f73c5a0000 — Unitas, on a contract padded with zeros at both ends — is a 124-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $22.6 million market cap against a $94.4 million fully-diluted figure on 904.1 million units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $340.5 thousand of tracked depth on $19.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $2 thousand of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UP or ESP?
By tracked market cap: UP (BNB Chain) measures $22.55M and ESP (Arbitrum) measures $55.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UP or ESP?
On the contract checks we publish: UP (BNB Chain) grades A and ESP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UP and ESP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show UP at −59.4% and ESP at −18.0%.
More comparisons
CRV vs UPUP vs GOHOMEUP vs VIRTUALMON vs UPESP vs NODAESP vs BNSOLESP vs JITOSOLESP vs JLUSDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.