NexUP vs ERC20 — price, size and safety, side by side
UP (BNB Chain) vs ERC20 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-10.
UP vs ERC20 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| UP | ERC20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1384 | $0.000000000000 |
| Market cap | $22.55M | $592 |
| 24h volume | $35.73M all venues | $3.95 DEX |
| Liquidity | $340.54K | $334.02K |
| FDV | $94.40M | $756.18 |
| Holders | 9,942 | 8,688 |
| Age (days) | 139 | 213 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- UP measures ~38,096× the market cap of ERC20
- UP measures ~9,045,236× the 24h volume of ERC20
- over the shared window UP moved −58.0% while ERC20 moved −100.0%
What the data says
UP
UP at 0x000008d2175f9aeaddb2430c26f8a6f73c5a0000 — Unitas, on a contract padded with zeros at both ends — is a 124-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $22.6 million market cap against a $94.4 million fully-diluted figure on 904.1 million units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $340.5 thousand of tracked depth on $19.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
ERC20
ERC20 — a token literally named "ERC20" on BNB Chain at 0x58730ae0faa10d73b0cddb5e7b87c3594f7a20cb — carries the most extreme valuation split in this batch: a market cap of $592 against a fully diluted figure of $756.2 on the November 4, 2026 snapshot.
A $13.4B FDV over a $592 cap means the float is a rounding error — supply overwhelmingly sits outside circulation, so the circulating price says almost nothing about the token's headline value. The contract can mint on top of that, the top ten wallets hold about 76.3%, and even so 8,688 wallets hold positions — with $334.0 thousand of tracked depth, more book than the cap itself.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UP or ERC20?
By tracked market cap: UP (BNB Chain) measures $22.55M and ERC20 (BNB Chain) measures $592 — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UP or ERC20?
On the contract checks we publish: UP (BNB Chain) grades A and ERC20 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UP and ERC20 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show UP at −58.0% and ERC20 at −100.0%.
More comparisons
CRV vs UPUP vs GOHOMEUP vs VIRTUALMON vs UPERC20 vs GOHOMECRV vs ERC20ERC20 vs VIRTUALMON vs ERC20
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.