NexUNI vs RETH — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs RETH (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-13.
UNI vs RETH — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| UNI | RETH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.09 | $2.35K |
| Market cap | $4.25B | $807.34M |
| 24h volume | $799.90M all venues | $62.88K all venues |
| Liquidity | $21.44M | $8.39M |
| FDV | $6.17B | $807.34M |
| Holders | 383,059 | 21,853 |
| Age (days) | 1,745 | 1,507 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~5.3× the market cap of RETH
- UNI measures ~2.6× the liquidity of RETH
- UNI measures ~12,720× the 24h volume of RETH
- UNI measures ~18× the holder count of RETH
- over the shared window UNI moved −4.22% while RETH moved −20.1%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $21.4 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
RETH
rETH is Rocket Pool's liquid staking receipt — the decentralized alternative in the ETH-staking market: anyone can run a Rocket Pool "minipool" validator with 8 ETH plus RPL collateral, and rETH appreciates against ETH as rewards accrue. The contract 0xae78736cd615f374d3085123a210448e74fc6393 is the canonical deployment; our November 6, 2026 read shows $8.4 million of tracked pool liquidity, with rETH's deeper venues spread across the wider DeFi stack.
The honest framing: rETH's pitch is credible neutrality — a permissionless operator set rather than one company's validators — and the trade-off is the usual one: a smaller, more fragmented liquidity surface than stETH and its own smart-contract surface (minipool mechanics, oracle DAO) instead of a single issuer's operations. The wrapper price is not ETH's price — it floats on its own exchange rate and has traded at discounts in stress.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or RETH?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $4.25B and RETH (Ethereum) measures $807.34M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or RETH?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and RETH (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and RETH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show UNI at −4.22% and RETH at −20.1%.
More comparisons
UNI vs CIRBTCUNI vs SUSDEUNI vs VVVUNI vs PAXGRETH vs SKYRETH vs KBTCSUSDAI vs RETHRETH vs USDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.