HostUNI vs QUICK — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs QUICK (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
UNI vs QUICK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| UNI | QUICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.09 | $0.003218 |
| Market cap | $4.25B | $2.65M |
| 24h volume | $799.90M all venues | $97.43K all venues |
| Liquidity | $21.44M | $155.89K |
| FDV | $6.17B | $2.81M |
| Holders | 383,059 | 54,042 |
| Age (days) | 1,745 | 1,454 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~1,602× the market cap of QUICK
- UNI measures ~138× the liquidity of QUICK
- UNI measures ~8,210× the 24h volume of QUICK
- UNI measures ~7.1× the holder count of QUICK
- over the shared window UNI moved −32.5% while QUICK moved −62.7%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $21.4 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
QUICK
QUICK at 0xb5c064f955d8e7f38fe0460c556a72987494ee17 is QuickSwap's exchange token on Polygon, 1,439 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The $2.7 million market cap prices most of the $2.8 million fully-diluted figure on 880.0 million units — the float is largely out.
The book is workable for a token this size: $155.9 thousand of tracked depth on $19.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — a quiet but real venue token pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or QUICK?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $4.25B and QUICK (Polygon) measures $2.65M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or QUICK?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and QUICK (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and QUICK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show UNI at −32.5% and QUICK at −62.7%.
More comparisons
UNI vs CIRBTCUNI vs SUSDEUNI vs VVVUNI vs PAXGQUICK vs FFQUICK vs CATZRO vs QUICKETHFI vs QUICK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.