NexUNI vs GMX — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs GMX (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-14.
UNI vs GMX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| UNI | GMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.09 | $7.09 |
| Market cap | $4.25B | $91.09M |
| 24h volume | $799.90M all venues | $3.96M all venues |
| Liquidity | $21.44M | $357.56K |
| FDV | $6.17B | $93.57M |
| Holders | 383,059 | 297,710 |
| Age (days) | 1,745 | 212 |
| Safety grade | A | D |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~47× the market cap of GMX
- UNI measures ~60× the liquidity of GMX
- UNI measures ~202× the 24h volume of GMX
- over the shared window UNI moved −32.5% while GMX moved −6.76%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $21.4 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices an $91.1 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $93.6 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $358 thousand of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or GMX?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $4.25B and GMX (Arbitrum) measures $91.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or GMX?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and GMX (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and GMX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show UNI at −32.5% and GMX at −6.76%.
More comparisons
UNI vs CIRBTCUNI vs SUSDEUNI vs VVVUNI vs PAXGGMX vs CRVGMX vs GOHOMEMON vs GMXGMX vs VIRTUAL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.