HostUNI vs FBOMB — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs FBOMB (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
UNI vs FBOMB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| UNI | FBOMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.09 | $0.01025 |
| Market cap | $4.25B | $5.29M |
| 24h volume | $799.90M all venues | $144.72K all venues |
| Liquidity | $21.44M | $37.06K |
| FDV | $6.17B | $227.10K |
| Holders | 383,059 | 3,506 |
| Age (days) | 1,745 | 1,196 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~803× the market cap of FBOMB
- UNI measures ~579× the liquidity of FBOMB
- UNI measures ~5,527× the 24h volume of FBOMB
- UNI measures ~109× the holder count of FBOMB
- over the shared window UNI moved −32.5% while FBOMB moved −39.1%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $21.4 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FBOMB
fBOMB at 0x74ccbe53f77b08632ce0cb91d3a545bf6b8e0979 — Fantom Bomb — is the Optimism deployment of a Fantom-ecosystem community token, 1,181 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $5.3 million market cap sits above the $227.1 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 33.4 million local units — the slice on this chain is a fraction of the headline.
The local book is proportionately deep: $37.1 thousand of tracked depth on $4.6 thousand of 24-hour volume — a quiet book where most of the float simply sits. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or FBOMB?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $4.25B and FBOMB (Optimism) measures $5.29M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or FBOMB?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and FBOMB (Optimism) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and FBOMB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show UNI at −32.5% and FBOMB at −39.1%.
More comparisons
UNI vs CIRBTCUNI vs SUSDEUNI vs VVVUNI vs PAXGPOL vs FBOMBTSAT vs FBOMBFBOMB vs CAKEFBOMB vs WEETH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.