NexUB vs SLC — price, size and safety, side by side
UB (BNB Chain) vs SLC (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-15.
UB vs SLC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| UB | SLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.111 | $0.3972 |
| Market cap | $278.25M | $54.28M |
| 24h volume | $11.42M all venues | $154.94K DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.50M | $2.49M |
| FDV | $216.49M | $18.22M |
| Holders | — | 20,069 |
| Age (days) | 394 | 71 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- UB measures ~5.1× the market cap of SLC
- UB measures ~74× the 24h volume of SLC
- over the shared window UB moved −19.9% while SLC moved −92.6%
What the data says
UB
UB at 0x40b8129b786d766267a7a118cf8c07e31cdb6fde — Unibase — is a BNB Chain asset 376 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $278.2 million market cap against a $216.5 million fully-diluted figure on 1.9 billion units.
The striking measurement is the tape: $16.4 million of 24-hour volume against $2.5 million of thin tracked depth — nearly six times the pool cycles daily, the profile of an asset whose order flow runs through routed venues far more than through this standing book. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
SLC
SLC at 0x8ac96df1d3dbd7c99a54cb4e50599ce129015e50 — styled StarLink — is a very young BNB Chain book: 71 days into its record at the November 5, 2026 snapshot, with 20,069 holders sharing an 11.1 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the priced float is what the pools and the book say it is.
The grading pulls in opposite directions. For depth, $2.5 million of tracked liquidity is deep — the best absolute pool in this batch — on $1.7 million of 24-hour volume. Against it: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted — and the ten largest wallets hold 99.7% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book behind a wide holder count. Freeze authority is revoked, and the contract is not a proxy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UB or SLC?
By tracked market cap: UB (BNB Chain) measures $278.25M and SLC (BNB Chain) measures $54.28M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UB or SLC?
On the contract checks we publish: UB (BNB Chain) grades B and SLC (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UB and SLC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show UB at −19.9% and SLC at −92.6%.
More comparisons
PENDLE vs UBARB vs UBUB vs PENGUUB vs SHIBPENDLE vs SLCARB vs SLCSLC vs PENGUSLC vs SHIB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.