NexU vs IBS — price, size and safety, side by side
U (BNB Chain) vs IBS (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-10.
U vs IBS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| U | IBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.999 | $5.73 |
| Market cap | $1.61B | $5.23M |
| 24h volume | $247.87M all venues | $325.02K all venues |
| Liquidity | $15.59M | $7.20M |
| FDV | $1.05B | $22.90M |
| Holders | 83,996 | 227,215 |
| Age (days) | 35 | 152 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- U measures ~308× the market cap of IBS
- U measures ~2.2× the liquidity of IBS
- U measures ~763× the 24h volume of IBS
- IBS measures ~2.7× the holder count of U
- over the shared window U moved −0.23% while IBS moved −38.7%
What the data says
U
U at 0xce24439f2d9c6a2289f741120fe202248b666666 is United Stables' dollar on BNB Chain — a fiat-backed stablecoin barely 17 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, and already carrying a $1.6 billion asset-wide market cap against a BNB Chain float priced $1.0 billion fully diluted. A billion dollars of supply does not appear quietly; that figure is the story.
Tracked depth reads $15.6 million — workable for the size — on $4.4 million of 24-hour volume, and the index flags what seventeen days always flags: the token is young enough that its track record is still being written. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question.
IBS
IBS at 0x255e746abb8d9acac00d6d023e5e63e3b8dfa7cd is a young BNB Chain asset — 152 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $5.2 million market cap across a compact 2.6 million supply.
The pool is the standout read in this batch: $7.2 million of tracked depth is deep — a third of the entire market cap sits in the exit book, a ratio most mid-caps never approach. The $934.4 thousand of daily volume is proportionate rather than frenzied. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, U or IBS?
By tracked market cap: U (BNB Chain) measures $1.61B and IBS (BNB Chain) measures $5.23M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, U or IBS?
On the contract checks we publish: U (BNB Chain) grades B and IBS (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have U and IBS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show U at −0.23% and IBS at −38.7%.
More comparisons
USD1 vs UXAUT vs URAY vs UTRUMP vs UIBS vs KBTCIBS vs USDCSKY vs IBSIBS vs EUROC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.