HostTRIPLET vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
TRIPLET (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
TRIPLET vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| TRIPLET | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.006311 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $6.11M | — |
| 24h volume | $698.63K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $370.74K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $6.11M | — |
| Holders | 21,882 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~4,570× the liquidity of TRIPLET
- CCV measures ~3,924× the 24h volume of TRIPLET
- over the shared window TRIPLET moved −25.3% while CCV moved 0.00%
What the data says
TRIPLET
TRIPLET — Tung Tung Tung Sahur — is a Solana meme built on the Italian-brainrot character wave, one of the few from that meta to hold a real market. The mint J8PSdNP3QewKq2Z1JJJFDMaqF7KcaiJhR7gbr5KZpump is what our scan tracks: $6.1 million market cap, $371 thousand of liquidity and 21,882 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest meme frame with a durability note: brainrot memes burned hot and fast, and most of the cohort is already dead — the ones still standing with real pools are the survivors the community kept. That is evidence of an active holder base, not of value; twenty-two thousand holders and a nearly-four-hundred-thousand-dollar pool is a real market by meme standards.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered NexFlow's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TRIPLET or CCV?
By tracked market cap: TRIPLET (Solana) measures $6.11M and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TRIPLET or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: TRIPLET (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TRIPLET and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show TRIPLET at −25.3% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
TRIPLET vs RYYTRIPLET vs FKBTRIPLET vs CRDTRIPLET vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.