HostTEL vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
TEL (Polygon) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-13.
TEL vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| TEL | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00143 | $6.09 |
| Market cap | — | $4.25B |
| 24h volume | $150.55K DEX | $799.90M all venues |
| Liquidity | $273.13K | $21.44M |
| FDV | $51.55M | $6.17B |
| Holders | 33,701 | 383,059 |
| Age (days) | 1,682 | 1,745 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~79× the liquidity of TEL
- UNI measures ~5,313× the 24h volume of TEL
- UNI measures ~11× the holder count of TEL
- over the shared window TEL moved −11.7% while UNI moved −32.5%
What the data says
TEL
TEL at 0xdf7837de1f2fa4631d716cf2502f8b230f1dcc32 is Telcoin's remittance asset in its PoS-bridged Polygon form — the payments token aimed at telecom corridors, carried to the chain where its retail flow actually trades. The November 4, 2026 snapshot prices a $51.5 million asset-wide market cap against a $51.5 million fully-diluted read of the local float — 38.3 billion units sitting on this chain.
The book is honest mid-cap shape: $273 thousand of tracked pool depth is workable for the size, on $72.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working tape rather than a churn chart. The deployment is 327 days into this index's record.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $21.4 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TEL or UNI?
By tracked market cap: TEL (Polygon) measures — and UNI (Ethereum) measures $4.25B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TEL or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: TEL (Polygon) grades B and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TEL and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show TEL at −11.7% and UNI at −32.5%.
More comparisons
VIRTUAL vs TELTEL vs ICPTEL vs SOLVBTCGOHOME vs TELUNI vs CIRBTCUNI vs SUSDEUNI vs VVVUNI vs PAXG
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.