HostTAROT vs WEETH — price, size and safety, side by side
TAROT (Optimism) vs WEETH (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-13.
TAROT vs WEETH — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| TAROT | WEETH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01579 | $2.17K |
| Market cap | $1.32M | $4.86B |
| 24h volume | $4.42K all venues | $7.59M all venues |
| Liquidity | $14.00K | $10.49M |
| FDV | $820.47K | $4.86B |
| Holders | 2,464 | — |
| Age (days) | 1,149 | 882 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- WEETH measures ~3,689× the market cap of TAROT
- WEETH measures ~749× the liquidity of TAROT
- WEETH measures ~1,719× the 24h volume of TAROT
- over the shared window TAROT moved −41.3% while WEETH moved −27.7%
What the data says
TAROT
TAROT at 0x1f514a61bcde34f94bc39731235690ab9da737f7 is the Optimism deployment of the Tarot lending-protocol token — 1,149 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $1.3 million market cap above a $820 thousand fully-diluted figure on 41.5 million units.
The distribution is the decisive read: the creator wallet alone holds 69.4% of supply, and the ten largest wallets hold 99.5% — a functionally single-party book behind 2,464 listed holders. The contract compounds it: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted, while freeze is revoked and it is not a proxy. $14.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees only $1.4 thousand of daily volume — a quiet tape.
WEETH
weETH is ether.fi's wrapped eETH — the non-rebasing form of the liquid restaking token that sits on EigenLayer beneath the staking layer, so the holder earns both Ethereum staking yield and restaking yield in one claim. The deployment 0xcd5fe23c85820f7b72d0926fc9b05b43e359b7ee is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $10.5 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: a restaking token is a claim on ETH that is doing two jobs at once — securing Ethereum's consensus and securing EigenLayer services — which means its risk stack is the union of both: staking slashing, restaking slashing, and ether.fi's own contract layer on top. The yield is real; so is the doubled surface it comes from.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TAROT or WEETH?
By tracked market cap: TAROT (Optimism) measures $1.32M and WEETH (Ethereum) measures $4.86B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TAROT or WEETH?
On the contract checks we publish: TAROT (Optimism) grades D and WEETH (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TAROT and WEETH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show TAROT at −41.3% and WEETH at −27.7%.
More comparisons
CAKE vs TAROTTAROT vs RETHTAROT vs NODATAROT vs BNSOLWEETH vs USDTBWEETH vs SUSDAIWEETH vs SKYUSDG vs WEETH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.