HostTAROT vs RETH — price, size and safety, side by side
TAROT (Optimism) vs RETH (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-13.
TAROT vs RETH — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| TAROT | RETH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01579 | $2.35K |
| Market cap | $1.32M | $807.34M |
| 24h volume | $4.42K all venues | $62.88K all venues |
| Liquidity | $14.00K | $8.39M |
| FDV | $820.47K | $807.34M |
| Holders | 2,464 | 21,853 |
| Age (days) | 1,149 | 1,507 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- RETH measures ~613× the market cap of TAROT
- RETH measures ~599× the liquidity of TAROT
- RETH measures ~14× the 24h volume of TAROT
- RETH measures ~8.9× the holder count of TAROT
- over the shared window TAROT moved −41.3% while RETH moved −25.9%
What the data says
TAROT
TAROT at 0x1f514a61bcde34f94bc39731235690ab9da737f7 is the Optimism deployment of the Tarot lending-protocol token — 1,149 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $1.3 million market cap above a $820 thousand fully-diluted figure on 41.5 million units.
The distribution is the decisive read: the creator wallet alone holds 69.4% of supply, and the ten largest wallets hold 99.5% — a functionally single-party book behind 2,464 listed holders. The contract compounds it: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted, while freeze is revoked and it is not a proxy. $14.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees only $1.4 thousand of daily volume — a quiet tape.
RETH
rETH is Rocket Pool's liquid staking receipt — the decentralized alternative in the ETH-staking market: anyone can run a Rocket Pool "minipool" validator with 8 ETH plus RPL collateral, and rETH appreciates against ETH as rewards accrue. The contract 0xae78736cd615f374d3085123a210448e74fc6393 is the canonical deployment; our November 6, 2026 read shows $8.4 million of tracked pool liquidity, with rETH's deeper venues spread across the wider DeFi stack.
The honest framing: rETH's pitch is credible neutrality — a permissionless operator set rather than one company's validators — and the trade-off is the usual one: a smaller, more fragmented liquidity surface than stETH and its own smart-contract surface (minipool mechanics, oracle DAO) instead of a single issuer's operations. The wrapper price is not ETH's price — it floats on its own exchange rate and has traded at discounts in stress.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TAROT or RETH?
By tracked market cap: TAROT (Optimism) measures $1.32M and RETH (Ethereum) measures $807.34M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TAROT or RETH?
On the contract checks we publish: TAROT (Optimism) grades D and RETH (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TAROT and RETH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show TAROT at −41.3% and RETH at −25.9%.
More comparisons
CAKE vs TAROTTAROT vs WEETHTAROT vs NODATAROT vs BNSOLRETH vs SKYRETH vs KBTCSUSDAI vs RETHRETH vs USDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.