HostTAROT vs MOOBIFI — price, size and safety, side by side
TAROT (Optimism) vs MOOBIFI (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
TAROT vs MOOBIFI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| TAROT | MOOBIFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03203 | $102.41 |
| Market cap | $2.07M | $1.21M |
| 24h volume | $1.41K | $4.55K |
| Liquidity | $199.92K | $110.40K |
| FDV | $1.27M | $1.24M |
| Holders | 2,464 | 15,538 |
| Age (days) | 1,149 | 1,063 |
| Safety grade | D | C |
Where they differ
- TAROT measures ~1.7× the market cap of MOOBIFI
- TAROT measures ~1.8× the liquidity of MOOBIFI
- MOOBIFI measures ~3.2× the 24h volume of TAROT
- MOOBIFI measures ~6.3× the holder count of TAROT
- over the shared window TAROT moved +6.04% while MOOBIFI moved −1.77%
What the data says
TAROT
TAROT at 0x1f514a61bcde34f94bc39731235690ab9da737f7 is the Optimism deployment of the Tarot lending-protocol token — 1,149 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $2.1 million market cap above a $1.3 million fully-diluted figure on 41.5 million units.
The distribution is the decisive read: the creator wallet alone holds 69.4% of supply, and the ten largest wallets hold 99.5% — a functionally single-party book behind 2,464 listed holders. The contract compounds it: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted, while freeze is revoked and it is not a proxy. $199.9 thousand of deep tracked depth sees only $1.4 thousand of daily volume — a quiet tape.
MOOBIFI
MOOBIFI is Beefy Finance's yield-bearing BIFI wrapper on Optimism — a "mooToken" receipt for BIFI deposited in the protocol's vault — at 0xc55e93c62874d8100dbd2dfe307edc1036ad5434, 1,063 days into its life on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A yield receipt inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the vault strategy underneath it. The measured side is quiet — a $1.2 million market cap against $110.4 thousand of tracked liquidity and $4.6 thousand of daily volume — a vault receipt that mostly changes hands through mint-and-burn rather than pool flow. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TAROT or MOOBIFI?
By tracked market cap: TAROT (Optimism) measures $2.07M and MOOBIFI (Optimism) measures $1.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TAROT or MOOBIFI?
On the contract checks we publish: TAROT (Optimism) grades D and MOOBIFI (Optimism) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TAROT and MOOBIFI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show TAROT at +6.04% and MOOBIFI at −1.77%.
More comparisons
EPIK vs TAROTVCHF vs TAROTTAROT vs HEEBOOTAROT vs USDVSPACEX vs MOOBIFIPOS vs MOOBIFIMOOBIFI vs ROUTERMOOBIFI vs 牛马
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.