HostTAROT vs LINK — price, size and safety, side by side
TAROT (Optimism) vs LINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
TAROT vs LINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| TAROT | LINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03203 | $14.30 |
| Market cap | $2.07M | $9.76B |
| 24h volume | $1.41K | $2.58M |
| Liquidity | $199.92K | $24.03M |
| FDV | $1.27M | $13.05B |
| Holders | 2,464 | 919,439 |
| Age (days) | 1,149 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~4,723× the market cap of TAROT
- LINK measures ~120× the liquidity of TAROT
- LINK measures ~1,825× the 24h volume of TAROT
- LINK measures ~373× the holder count of TAROT
What the data says
TAROT
TAROT at 0x1f514a61bcde34f94bc39731235690ab9da737f7 is the Optimism deployment of the Tarot lending-protocol token — 1,149 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $2.1 million market cap above a $1.3 million fully-diluted figure on 41.5 million units.
The distribution is the decisive read: the creator wallet alone holds 69.4% of supply, and the ten largest wallets hold 99.5% — a functionally single-party book behind 2,464 listed holders. The contract compounds it: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted, while freeze is revoked and it is not a proxy. $199.9 thousand of deep tracked depth sees only $1.4 thousand of daily volume — a quiet tape.
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $24.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TAROT or LINK?
By tracked market cap: TAROT (Optimism) measures $2.07M and LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.76B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TAROT or LINK?
On the contract checks we publish: TAROT (Optimism) grades D and LINK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TAROT and LINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show TAROT at +6.04% and LINK at +10.3%.
More comparisons
EPIK vs TAROTVCHF vs TAROTTAROT vs HEEBOOTAROT vs USDVLINK vs USD1ETH vs LINKSUSDE vs LINKLINK vs AAVE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.