HostSUT vs GNS — price, size and safety, side by side
SUT (Polygon) vs GNS (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-14.
SUT vs GNS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-14T21:16:23
| SUT | GNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2238 | $0.3081 |
| Market cap | — | $8.85M |
| 24h volume | $35.15K DEX | $347.18K all venues |
| Liquidity | $53.28K | $165.59K |
| FDV | $43.36M | $7.09M |
| Holders | 53,791 | 14,134 |
| Age (days) | 339 | 832 |
| Safety grade | A | D |
Where they differ
- GNS measures ~3.1× the liquidity of SUT
- GNS measures ~9.9× the 24h volume of SUT
- SUT measures ~3.8× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window SUT moved −44.1% while GNS moved −30.2%
What the data says
SUT
SUT at 0x98965474ecbec2f532f1f780ee37b0b05f77ca55 — styled "SUPER TRUST" — is a Polygon token 324 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, which carries no market-cap reading for it. What the snapshot does measure: 53,791 holders across a 238.4 million supply, $53.3 thousand of tracked pool depth, and $31.2 thousand of 24-hour turnover — a modest book on every axis.
The contract read is the strong half: the contract cannot mint new supply, cannot freeze balances, and is not a proxy — grade A on code posture. The distribution read is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 70.8% of supply, so most of the float sits in a few wallets even though the holder count is broad.
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $8.9 million market cap, against a $7.1 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $165.6 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUT or GNS?
By tracked market cap: SUT (Polygon) measures — and GNS (Arbitrum) measures $8.85M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUT or GNS?
On the contract checks we publish: SUT (Polygon) grades A and GNS (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUT and GNS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-14T21:16:23, the measured snapshots show SUT at −44.1% and GNS at −30.2%.
More comparisons
TSAT vs SUTSUT vs POLUNI vs SUTLINK.E vs SUTZRO vs GNSETHFI vs GNSGRASS vs GNSGNS vs FF
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-14T21:16:23; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.