HostSUSDAI vs JLP — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSDAI (Arbitrum) vs JLP (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
SUSDAI vs JLP — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| SUSDAI | JLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.12 | $4.43 |
| Market cap | $479.95M | $946.26M |
| 24h volume | $1.70M DEX | $13.23M DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.60M | $6.77M |
| FDV | $338.88M | $946.26M |
| Holders | 3,702 | 89,741 |
| Age (days) | 448 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- JLP measures ~2.0× the market cap of SUSDAI
- JLP measures ~7.8× the 24h volume of SUSDAI
- JLP measures ~24× the holder count of SUSDAI
What the data says
SUSDAI
SUSDAI is the staked wrapper of USDai — the yield-bearing form of a dollar token issued against AI-infrastructure financing — trading on Arbitrum at 0x0b2b2b2076d95dda7817e785989fe353fe955ef9. The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $7.6 million of tracked pool liquidity, the deepest single line item in this slice of the index.
What the numbers say: roughly seven months of trading history behind it, about $2.2 million of 24-hour volume against that liquidity base — a turnover ratio near 12%, the shape of a yield instrument held rather than churned. The ~$1.11 print against a $1-asset wrapper is consistent with accrued staking yield rather than a broken peg, though the snapshot alone cannot separate the two.
JLP
JLP is not a normal token and should not be read like one: it is the liquidity-provider share of Jupiter's perpetuals exchange — a claim on a managed basket of SOL, ETH, wBTC and stablecoins that serves as the counterparty to every trader on the venue. The October 6, 2026 snapshot values the deployment at roughly $946 million across 89,741 holders on mint 27G8MtK7VtTcCHkpASjSDdkWWYfoqT6ggEuKidVJidD4 — the largest asset on this page's list after the platform tokens.
Both authority flags read unconfirmed in this snapshot, and for once that is close to inevitable: a pool share mints when liquidity is deposited and burns when it is withdrawn, so live mint machinery — program-held — is the design. The honest statement remains "unresolved in this read, verify live," and the scanner above does exactly that; what a holder is actually trusting is the Jupiter perps program, not an SPL switch.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSDAI or JLP?
By tracked market cap: SUSDAI (Arbitrum) measures $479.95M and JLP (Solana) measures $946.26M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSDAI or JLP?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSDAI (Arbitrum) grades B and JLP (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSDAI and JLP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show SUSDAI at +0.46% and JLP at +2.95%.
More comparisons
SUSDAI vs SKYSUSDAI vs ENASUSDAI vs SPXUSDC vs SUSDAIJLP vs ENAJLP vs SPXSKY vs JLPJLP vs EUROC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.