HostSUPER vs XAVA — price, size and safety, side by side
SUPER (Avalanche) vs XAVA (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
SUPER vs XAVA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| SUPER | XAVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1358 | $0.09916 |
| Market cap | $114.38M | $11.13M |
| 24h volume | $7.94M all venues | $76.46K all venues |
| Liquidity | $313.37K | $173.72K |
| FDV | $830.74K | $11.13M |
| Holders | 4,108 | 37,266 |
| Age (days) | 448 | 1,249 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SUPER measures ~10× the market cap of XAVA
- SUPER measures ~1.8× the liquidity of XAVA
- SUPER measures ~104× the 24h volume of XAVA
- XAVA measures ~9.1× the holder count of SUPER
- over the shared window SUPER moved −7.30% while XAVA moved −42.5%
What the data says
SUPER
SUPER at 0x09fa58228bb791ea355c90da1e4783452b9bd8c3 is the Avalanche deployment of the SuperVerse token — the gaming-ecosystem asset carried here as a bridged book 430 days into its record. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices the 5.0 million local units at $830.7 thousand fully diluted, inside the asset-wide $114.4 million market cap — a sliver of the headline float lives on this chain.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The local book is small and top-heavy: 4,108 holders with the ten largest wallets at 88.6% of supply, and $313.4 thousand of thin tracked depth on $28.5 thousand of daily volume.
XAVA
XAVA at 0xd1c3f94de7e5b45fa4edbba472491a9f4b166fc4 — Avalaunch — is the launchpad platform token of the Avalanche ecosystem, 1,249 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $11.1 million market cap across a 100.0 million supply.
The book is workable rather than deep: $173.7 thousand of tracked depth on $12.6 thousand of 24-hour volume — the quiet, held-not-flipped profile of a platform token whose holders stake for allocation rather than trade the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUPER or XAVA?
By tracked market cap: SUPER (Avalanche) measures $114.38M and XAVA (Avalanche) measures $11.13M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUPER or XAVA?
On the contract checks we publish: SUPER (Avalanche) grades A and XAVA (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUPER and XAVA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show SUPER at −7.30% and XAVA at −42.5%.
More comparisons
GOHOME vs SUPERSUPER vs VIRTUALCRV vs SUPERSUPER vs ICPGRASS vs XAVAXAVA vs ETHFIXAVA vs ZROXAVA vs FF
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.