HostSUPER vs WBTC.E — price, size and safety, side by side
SUPER (Avalanche) vs WBTC.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
SUPER vs WBTC.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| SUPER | WBTC.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1358 | $64.66K |
| Market cap | $114.38M | $22.96M |
| 24h volume | $7.94M all venues | $15.19K all venues |
| Liquidity | $313.37K | $295.75K |
| FDV | $830.74K | $22.96M |
| Holders | 4,108 | 8,992 |
| Age (days) | 448 | 1,820 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- SUPER measures ~5.0× the market cap of WBTC.E
- SUPER measures ~523× the 24h volume of WBTC.E
- WBTC.E measures ~2.2× the holder count of SUPER
- over the shared window SUPER moved −7.30% while WBTC.E moved −23.0%
What the data says
SUPER
SUPER at 0x09fa58228bb791ea355c90da1e4783452b9bd8c3 is the Avalanche deployment of the SuperVerse token — the gaming-ecosystem asset carried here as a bridged book 430 days into its record. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices the 5.0 million local units at $830.7 thousand fully diluted, inside the asset-wide $114.4 million market cap — a sliver of the headline float lives on this chain.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The local book is small and top-heavy: 4,108 holders with the ten largest wallets at 88.6% of supply, and $313.4 thousand of thin tracked depth on $28.5 thousand of daily volume.
WBTC.E
WBTC.E at 0x50b7545627a5162f82a992c33b87adc75187b218 is the legacy bridge's wrapped bitcoin on Avalanche — the ".e" suffix marking the original Avalanche Bridge mint, distinguished from the newer BTC.b deployment — 1,820 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $23.0 million market cap on 315 local units.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $295.7 thousand of tracked depth on $165.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling near half itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUPER or WBTC.E?
By tracked market cap: SUPER (Avalanche) measures $114.38M and WBTC.E (Avalanche) measures $22.96M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUPER or WBTC.E?
On the contract checks we publish: SUPER (Avalanche) grades A and WBTC.E (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUPER and WBTC.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show SUPER at −7.30% and WBTC.E at −23.0%.
More comparisons
GOHOME vs SUPERSUPER vs VIRTUALCRV vs SUPERSUPER vs ICPVIRTUAL vs WBTC.EGOHOME vs WBTC.ECRV vs WBTC.EWBTC.E vs ICP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.