HostSUPER vs AUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
SUPER (Avalanche) vs AUSD (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
SUPER vs AUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SUPER | AUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.212 | $0.9994 |
| Market cap | $135.71M | $234.29M |
| 24h volume | $114.21K | $322.55K |
| Liquidity | $414.89K | $2.82M |
| FDV | $1.09M | $162.22M |
| Holders | 4,108 | 10,320 |
| Age (days) | 430 | 300 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- AUSD measures ~1.7× the market cap of SUPER
- AUSD measures ~6.8× the liquidity of SUPER
- AUSD measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of SUPER
- AUSD measures ~2.5× the holder count of SUPER
- over the shared window SUPER moved +34.7% while AUSD moved −0.00%
What the data says
SUPER
SUPER at 0x09fa58228bb791ea355c90da1e4783452b9bd8c3 is the Avalanche deployment of the SuperVerse token — the gaming-ecosystem asset carried here as a bridged book 430 days into its record. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices the 5.0 million local units at $1.1 million fully diluted, inside the asset-wide $135.7 million market cap — a sliver of the headline float lives on this chain.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The local book is small and top-heavy: 4,108 holders with the ten largest wallets at 88.6% of supply, and $414.9 thousand of thin tracked depth on $28.5 thousand of daily volume.
AUSD
AUSD is Agora's institutional dollar — a stablecoin built for treasury-grade backing (State Street custodian, VanEck management) that targets the same regulated-treasury ground as USDC and PYUSD. The deployment 0x00000000efe302beaa2b3e6e1b18d08d69a9012a is the Monad deployment — the same multichain address AUSD uses on every chain it lands on; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AUSD competes on custody pedigree rather than yield gimmicks — which means its risk profile is the boring kind (issuer solvency, attestation cadence, redemption terms) that is easier to verify but no smaller for being verifiable. AUSD also exists on Solana under a different mint; this Monad deployment carries the same canonical multichain address as its siblings.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUPER or AUSD?
By tracked market cap: SUPER (Avalanche) measures $135.71M and AUSD (Monad) measures $234.29M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUPER or AUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: SUPER (Avalanche) grades A and AUSD (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUPER and AUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SUPER at +34.7% and AUSD at −0.00%.
More comparisons
CRV vs SUPERSUPER vs VELVETHIMS vs SUPERPRL vs SUPERUB vs AUSDAUSD vs SOLAUSD vs MSETHNPC vs AUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.