HostSTUPID vs SNX — price, size and safety, side by side
STUPID (Solana) vs SNX (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
STUPID vs SNX — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| STUPID | SNX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0003861 | $0.2588 |
| Market cap | $375.37K | $150.37M |
| 24h volume | $3.35K | $11.98K |
| Liquidity | $104.55K | $104.19K |
| FDV | $375.37K | $150.19M |
| Holders | 19,688 | 87,651 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- SNX measures ~401× the market cap of STUPID
- SNX measures ~3.6× the 24h volume of STUPID
- SNX measures ~4.5× the holder count of STUPID
What the data says
STUPID
STUPID — StupidCoin on Solana, mint 9RjwNo6hBPkxayWHCqQD1VjaH8igSizEseNZNbddpump — is a pump.fun graduate wearing the self-deprecating ticker that got a second life when a prominent trader publicly adopted the "stupid coin" frame. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $375 thousand across a wide 19,688-holder file — ~$14 per wallet.
That file shape — nearly twenty thousand wallets on a quarter-million cap — is the dust-community profile: a token bought by a huge crowd at small size, mostly held, mostly underwater from the peaks, still present. $105 thousand of liquidity is a healthy 29% of cap; ~$10 thousand of daily volume is quiet but nonzero.
SNX
One detail on SNX didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-27 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where SNX stands today: thin liquidity of $104.19K and 87,651 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $150.37M, that $104.19K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 87,651-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-09-27, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, STUPID or SNX?
By tracked market cap: STUPID (Solana) measures $375.37K and SNX (Ethereum) measures $150.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, STUPID or SNX?
On the contract checks we publish: STUPID (Solana) grades A and SNX (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have STUPID and SNX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show STUPID at 0.00% and SNX at 0.00%.
More comparisons
STUPID vs RWASTUPID vs CANDLESTUPID vs KOXSTUPID vs SNAPCANDLE vs SNXRWA vs SNXSNX vs KOXSNX vs SNAP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.