HostSQQQ vs UNC — price, size and safety, side by side
SQQQ (Solana) vs UNC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SQQQ vs UNC — normalized performance, 2026-09-25 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| SQQQ | UNC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $33.49 | $0.0005981 |
| Market cap | $255.62K | $617.89K |
| 24h volume | $15.48M | $65.54K |
| Liquidity | $76.54K | $76.10K |
| FDV | $255.62K | $617.89K |
| Holders | 2,689 | 12,383 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- UNC measures ~2.4× the market cap of SQQQ
- SQQQ measures ~236× the 24h volume of UNC
- UNC measures ~4.6× the holder count of SQQQ
- over the shared window SQQQ moved −0.30% while UNC moved −6.28%
What the data says
SQQQ
SQQQ is Backpack's xStock for the ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ — the 3× leveraged inverse-Nasdaq ETF — tokenized on Solana at SQQQAa3gUxgnqcEsdjPA4RQNQBgB97TnG2hJhk2WaGE. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $255.6 thousand market cap across 2,689 wallets.
The tape is the most extreme in this batch: $15.5 million of 24h volume against $76.5 thousand of tracked liquidity — a pool turning over two hundred times a day, exactly what a leveraged-short instrument does in a volatile session. The backing and decay mechanics are the issuer's domain: SQQQ inherits the ETF's daily-reset leverage drag on top of the wrapper's custody structure.
UNC
unc — UNC — a Solana community meme (the "unc" slang brand — internet uncle culture), at mint ACtfUWtgvaXrQGNMiohTusi5jcx5RJf5zwu9aAxkpump. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $76 thousand of liquidity and roughly 12,383 holders.
Slang-brand memes ride vocabulary durability — "unc" is persistent internet language — with standard no-cash-flow economics.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SQQQ or UNC?
By tracked market cap: SQQQ (Solana) measures $255.62K and UNC (Solana) measures $617.89K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SQQQ or UNC?
On the contract checks we publish: SQQQ (Solana) grades A and UNC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SQQQ and UNC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-25 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show SQQQ at −0.30% and UNC at −6.28%.
More comparisons
SQQQ vs BSTONKSQQQ vs DOLANSQQQ vs CHOGMYRO vs SQQQCHOG vs UNCDOLAN vs UNCBSTONK vs UNCUNC vs YNE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-25→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.