HostSQD vs WEETH — price, size and safety, side by side
SQD (Arbitrum) vs WEETH (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
SQD vs WEETH — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SQD | WEETH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03036 | $2.97K |
| Market cap | $39.68M | $5.89B |
| 24h volume | $3.38K | $532.17K |
| Liquidity | $226.13K | $14.39M |
| FDV | $40.29M | $5.89B |
| Holders | 17,095 | 28,590 |
| Age (days) | 809 | 990 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- WEETH measures ~148× the market cap of SQD
- WEETH measures ~64× the liquidity of SQD
- WEETH measures ~157× the 24h volume of SQD
- WEETH measures ~1.7× the holder count of SQD
- over the shared window SQD moved +9.76% while WEETH moved −0.94%
What the data says
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $39.7 million market cap prices nearly all of the $40.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $226.1 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
WEETH
weETH is ether.fi's wrapped eETH — the non-rebasing form of the liquid restaking token that sits on EigenLayer beneath the staking layer, so the holder earns both Ethereum staking yield and restaking yield in one claim. The deployment 0xcd5fe23c85820f7b72d0926fc9b05b43e359b7ee is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $14.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: a restaking token is a claim on ETH that is doing two jobs at once — securing Ethereum's consensus and securing EigenLayer services — which means its risk stack is the union of both: staking slashing, restaking slashing, and ether.fi's own contract layer on top. The yield is real; so is the doubled surface it comes from.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SQD or WEETH?
By tracked market cap: SQD (Arbitrum) measures $39.68M and WEETH (Ethereum) measures $5.89B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SQD or WEETH?
On the contract checks we publish: SQD (Arbitrum) grades D and WEETH (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SQD and WEETH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SQD at +9.76% and WEETH at −0.94%.
More comparisons
UNIBTC vs SQDLASO vs SQDSQD vs CRVSQD vs RHEAWEETH vs UWEETH vs USDCWEETH vs AGXUSDE vs WEETH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.