HostSQD vs RAIN — price, size and safety, side by side
SQD (Arbitrum) vs RAIN (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
SQD vs RAIN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| SQD | RAIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01423 | $0.003653 |
| Market cap | $24.09M | $4.12B |
| 24h volume | $909.50K all venues | $12.83M all venues |
| Liquidity | $117.49K | $115.75K |
| FDV | $24.36M | $6.59B |
| Holders | 17,087 | 173,867 |
| Age (days) | 824 | 355 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- RAIN measures ~171× the market cap of SQD
- RAIN measures ~14× the 24h volume of SQD
- RAIN measures ~10× the holder count of SQD
- over the shared window SQD moved −48.8% while RAIN moved −74.1%
What the data says
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The $24.1 million market cap prices nearly all of the $24.4 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $117.5 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
RAIN
RAIN is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum trading on real depth: the contract 0x25118290e6a5f4139381d072181157035864099d is what our scan tracks, with $116 thousand of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026.
The honest note is about verifiability rather than the project: tokens in this tier have shallow public documentation, and our scan's read is primarily on-chain — the pool is real and functional, but verify the project's identity and contract ownership through its official channels before treating the liquidity as endorsement. Arbitrum hosts a long tail of tokens that look similar in a scan.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SQD or RAIN?
By tracked market cap: SQD (Arbitrum) measures $24.09M and RAIN (Arbitrum) measures $4.12B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SQD or RAIN?
On the contract checks we publish: SQD (Arbitrum) grades D and RAIN (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SQD and RAIN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show SQD at −48.8% and RAIN at −74.1%.
More comparisons
LINK vs SQDSQD vs AVAXSQD vs LDOSQD vs WLDLINK vs RAINRAIN vs AVAXRAIN vs LDORAIN vs WLD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.