HostSQD vs ORDER — price, size and safety, side by side
SQD (Arbitrum) vs ORDER (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
SQD vs ORDER — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| SQD | ORDER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01423 | $0.0274 |
| Market cap | $24.09M | $14.15M |
| 24h volume | $909.50K all venues | $5.80M all venues |
| Liquidity | $117.49K | $96.23K |
| FDV | $24.36M | $297.75K |
| Holders | 17,087 | 6,656 |
| Age (days) | 824 | 431 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- SQD measures ~1.7× the market cap of ORDER
- ORDER measures ~6.4× the 24h volume of SQD
- SQD measures ~2.6× the holder count of ORDER
- over the shared window SQD moved −48.8% while ORDER moved −30.2%
What the data says
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The $24.1 million market cap prices nearly all of the $24.4 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $117.5 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
ORDER
ORDER at 0x4e200fe2f3efb977d5fd9c430a41531fb04d97b8 is the Arbitrum deployment of Orderly Network's token, 431 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $14.1 million market cap sits far above a $297.8 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 11.3 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $96.2 thousand of tracked depth on $32.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working but modest slice. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SQD or ORDER?
By tracked market cap: SQD (Arbitrum) measures $24.09M and ORDER (Arbitrum) measures $14.15M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SQD or ORDER?
On the contract checks we publish: SQD (Arbitrum) grades D and ORDER (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SQD and ORDER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show SQD at −48.8% and ORDER at −30.2%.
More comparisons
SQD vs RAINLINK vs SQDSQD vs AVAXSQD vs LDOORDER vs WLDLDO vs ORDERAVAX vs ORDERORDER vs USDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.