HostSPYB vs GITLAWB — price, size and safety, side by side
SPYB (BNB Chain) vs GITLAWB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
SPYB vs GITLAWB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SPYB | GITLAWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $771.68 | $0.00004567 |
| Market cap | $15.18M | $6.09M |
| 24h volume | $1.47M | $1.50M |
| Liquidity | $1.94M | $1.90M |
| FDV | $15.07M | $6.05M |
| Holders | 121,717 | 11,544 |
| Age (days) | 75 | 194 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- SPYB measures ~2.5× the market cap of GITLAWB
- SPYB measures ~11× the holder count of GITLAWB
- over the shared window SPYB moved +1.11% while GITLAWB moved −25.1%
What the data says
SPYB
SPYB at 0x7138b48df7d98d7e3cc221bfe7192d0a178182d8 — deployed as "SPY (bStocks Tokenized Stock)" — is a BNB Chain asset 75 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $15.2 million market cap across a 19.7 thousand supply.
The name claims a tokenized-stock structure; the measured data says nothing about backing, and this page does not assert it — what it verifies is the contract identity and the book: $1.9 million of deep tracked depth on $1.5 million of 24-hour volume, a genuinely active tape for a young deployment. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GITLAWB
GITLAWB at 0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3 is a Base asset 194 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $6.1 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
The book is unusually liquid for the cap: $1.9 million of tracked depth is deep — nearly a third of the valuation — and the $1.5 million daily volume nearly cycles the whole pool every day, a genuinely active tape rather than a dormant holding. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SPYB or GITLAWB?
By tracked market cap: SPYB (BNB Chain) measures $15.18M and GITLAWB (Base) measures $6.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SPYB or GITLAWB?
On the contract checks we publish: SPYB (BNB Chain) grades B and GITLAWB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SPYB and GITLAWB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SPYB at +1.11% and GITLAWB at −25.1%.
More comparisons
SOLO vs SPYB牛来 vs SPYBSPYB vs TROLLSPYB vs MONGITLAWB vs MONGITLAWB vs NVDACGITLAWB vs FETTROLL vs GITLAWB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.