NexSPYB vs CTM — price, size and safety, side by side
SPYB (BNB Chain) vs CTM (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-12.
SPYB vs CTM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| SPYB | CTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $754.80 | $0.1785 |
| Market cap | $21.21M | — |
| 24h volume | $7.92M all venues | $607.04K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.25M | $1.31M |
| FDV | $21.21M | $58.16M |
| Holders | 121,717 | 4,989 |
| Age (days) | 75 | 189 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- SPYB measures ~13× the 24h volume of CTM
- SPYB measures ~24× the holder count of CTM
- over the shared window SPYB moved −1.11% while CTM moved −30.8%
What the data says
SPYB
SPYB at 0x7138b48df7d98d7e3cc221bfe7192d0a178182d8 — deployed as "SPY (bStocks Tokenized Stock)" — is a BNB Chain asset 75 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $21.2 million market cap across a 19.7 thousand supply.
The name claims a tokenized-stock structure; the measured data says nothing about backing, and this page does not assert it — what it verifies is the contract identity and the book: $1.3 million of deep tracked depth on $1.5 million of 24-hour volume, a genuinely active tape for a young deployment. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our November 6, 2026 read shows $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SPYB or CTM?
By tracked market cap: SPYB (BNB Chain) measures $21.21M and CTM (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SPYB or CTM?
On the contract checks we publish: SPYB (BNB Chain) grades B and CTM (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SPYB and CTM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show SPYB at −1.11% and CTM at −30.8%.
More comparisons
SPYB vs QNTONDO vs SPYBMORPHO vs SPYBSPYB vs LITCTM vs QNTONDO vs CTMMORPHO vs CTMMETH vs CTM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.