HostSPCXC vs GUA — price, size and safety, side by side
SPCXC (Base) vs GUA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
SPCXC vs GUA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SPCXC | GUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $148.84 | $0.03606 |
| Market cap | $1.32M | $1.52M |
| 24h volume | $1.60M | $973.63K |
| Liquidity | $559.14K | $557.44K |
| FDV | $1.32M | $33.59M |
| Holders | 3,696 | 16,688 |
| Age (days) | 18 | 299 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- SPCXC measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of GUA
- GUA measures ~4.5× the holder count of SPCXC
- over the shared window SPCXC moved −2.98% while GUA moved +6.54%
What the data says
SPCXC
SPCXC on Base — 0xb2000000000000000000007b9fcbd005511acbd5 — trades as "Space Exploration Technologies Corp.", the formal name of SpaceX, at $150.23 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot, with $559 thousand of liquidity and roughly $3.3 million of daily volume.
This one deserves a sharper version of the family's usual caveat. SpaceX is privately held — there is no public float, no exchange-listed share an issuer can simply buy and wrap the way the family's AAPL or METAC contracts could in principle be backed. Whatever backs a "tokenized SpaceX" is at best a claim on secondary-market private shares, at worst nothing but a price oracle and a name. The private-versus-public distinction is exactly where the tokenized-stock pitch stops being mechanically possible and becomes purely a trust-me product.
GUA
GUA at 0xa5c8e1513b6a08334b479fe4d71f1253259469be is a 299-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.5 million market cap against a $33.6 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is deep against the small cap: $557.4 thousand of tracked depth on $973.6 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool holding a third of the cap with a working tape. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SPCXC or GUA?
By tracked market cap: SPCXC (Base) measures $1.32M and GUA (BNB Chain) measures $1.52M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SPCXC or GUA?
On the contract checks we publish: SPCXC (Base) grades B and GUA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SPCXC and GUA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SPCXC at −2.98% and GUA at +6.54%.
More comparisons
CYS vs SPCXCSPCXC vs HANASPCXC vs TAOKNOTS vs SPCXCCYS vs GUAGUA vs HANAGUA vs TAOKNOTS vs GUA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.