HostSPCXC vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
SPCXC (Base) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SPCXC vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SPCXC | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $150.23 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $3.25M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $896.46K | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 11 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~2,214× the liquidity of SPCXC
- CRD measures ~1,238× the 24h volume of SPCXC
What the data says
SPCXC
There's a small gap on this page — SPCXC's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-09-14. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On liquidity and holders, SPCXC shows $896.46K of on-chain liquidity and a brand-new record at 11 days as of 2026-09-14. Read $896.46K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: NexFlow's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SPCXC or CRD?
By tracked market cap: SPCXC (Base) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SPCXC or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: SPCXC (Base) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SPCXC and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SPCXC at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SPCXC vs RYYSPCXC vs FKBSPCXC vs RDKSPCXC vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.