NexSPCXB vs 79AU — price, size and safety, side by side
SPCXB (BNB Chain) vs 79AU (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-15.
SPCXB vs 79AU — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| SPCXB | 79AU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $140.82 | $5.03 |
| Market cap | $197.68M | — |
| 24h volume | $82.19M all venues | $1.39M DEX |
| Liquidity | $5.23M | $5.03M |
| FDV | $198.02M | $1.18B |
| Holders | 269,969 | 41,285 |
| Age (days) | 66 | 132 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- SPCXB measures ~59× the 24h volume of 79AU
- SPCXB measures ~6.5× the holder count of 79AU
- over the shared window SPCXB moved −8.26% while 79AU moved −2.16%
What the data says
SPCXB
SPCXB at 0xbe9d156892e55e7154bcd3cb0fea677f9d3103e1 — deployed under the name "SpaceX" — is a BNB Chain asset 51 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $197.7 million market cap across a 447.6 thousand supply.
The name is the first thing to check on a token like this: a corporate borrow on an immutable contract proves nothing about affiliation — what proves identity is the address, printed above. The book itself is substantial: $5.2 million of deep tracked depth on $2.0 million of daily volume, a live tape under a young cap. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
79AU
79AU at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca is a 114-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.2 billion cap on $5.0 million of tracked liquidity, 41,285 wallets holding at the November 5, 2026 snapshot.
Three reads belong together here. The pool is workable — the deepest in this batch — but thin against the cap's own size. The contract takes a 2.99% tax on every sale, so a round trip costs close to 6% before slippage. And the ten largest wallets hold about 96.8% of supply: a float that concentrated means the cap's moves are steered by very few hands, whatever the holder count says.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SPCXB or 79AU?
By tracked market cap: SPCXB (BNB Chain) measures $197.68M and 79AU (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SPCXB or 79AU?
On the contract checks we publish: SPCXB (BNB Chain) grades B and 79AU (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SPCXB and 79AU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show SPCXB at −8.26% and 79AU at −2.16%.
More comparisons
SPX vs SPCXBSPCXB vs JLPSPCXB vs LBTCAERO vs SPCXB79AU vs JLP79AU vs LBTC79AU vs JUPSPX vs 79AU
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.