HostSOL vs BRETT — price, size and safety, side by side
SOL (Solana) vs BRETT (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SOL vs BRETT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| SOL | BRETT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $122.52 | $0.006153 |
| Market cap | $70.79B | $60.97M |
| 24h volume | $4.48B | $418.84K |
| Liquidity | $959.88M | $1.25M |
| FDV | $76.46B | $60.97M |
| Holders | 3,820,662 | 907,798 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SOL measures ~1,161× the market cap of BRETT
- SOL measures ~768× the liquidity of BRETT
- SOL measures ~10,690× the 24h volume of BRETT
- SOL measures ~4.2× the holder count of BRETT
- over the shared window SOL moved +3.01% while BRETT moved +9.92%
What the data says
SOL
Wrapped SOL is the one token on this site that is barely a token at all. SOL itself — the coin that pays for every transaction on Solana — is not an SPL token, so any program that expects the SPL standard works with this wrapper instead: one wSOL always represents one SOL, held in a token account you can unwrap back to native SOL at any moment. When a DEX route, a lending pool, or a liquidity pair says "SOL," this mint — So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 — is almost always what it means under the hood.
The safety read here is about as clean as the format allows, and for a structural reason rather than a flattering one. As of the September 26, 2026 snapshot both the mint authority and the freeze authority read revoked: nobody can print unbacked wSOL, and nobody can freeze a wallet's balance. That isn't a team making good choices — it's baked into how the wrapper works, which is exactly why wrapped SOL is the reference point other tokens get measured against. The snapshot puts roughly 3.82 million holders on the mint and about $960 million of tracked liquidity, numbers no ordinary SPL token approaches.
BRETT
BRETT passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. Neither lever existing is the main reason BRETT's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-27).
Looking at the market data, BRETT shows $1.25M of on-chain liquidity and 907,798 holders as of 2026-09-27. The $1.25M pool against a ~$60.97M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. A holder base of 907,798 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-09-27, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SOL or BRETT?
By tracked market cap: SOL (Solana) measures $70.79B and BRETT (Base) measures $60.97M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SOL or BRETT?
On the contract checks we publish: SOL (Solana) grades A and BRETT (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SOL and BRETT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show SOL at +3.01% and BRETT at +9.92%.
More comparisons
SOL vs WETHSOL vs WBNBSOL vs USDTUSDC vs SOLBRETT vs MORPHOCLANKER vs BRETTBRETT vs VIBEBRETT vs TWT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.