HostSLOTH vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
SLOTH (Solana) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SLOTH vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| SLOTH | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001102 | $0.08418 |
| Market cap | $1.94M | $245.37M |
| 24h volume | $6.41K | $7.04M |
| Liquidity | $183.60K | $313.10K |
| FDV | $1.94M | $22.90M |
| Holders | 22,330 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | — | 234 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~126× the market cap of SLOTH
- ZAMA measures ~1.7× the liquidity of SLOTH
- ZAMA measures ~1,099× the 24h volume of SLOTH
- SLOTH measures ~6.3× the holder count of ZAMA
- over the shared window SLOTH moved +14.2% while ZAMA moved −16.1%
What the data says
SLOTH
Slothana — SLOTH — the sloth meme that ran one of the bigger Solana meme presales of the 2024 wave, at mint HQ7DaoiUxzC2K1Dr7KXRHccNtXvEYgNvoUextXe8dmBh. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $184 thousand of liquidity and roughly 22,330 holders.
Presale-era memes carry a specific history: the presale buyers funded the liquidity, which makes the holder distribution unusually broad from day one — 22,330 shows it. The economics are standard meme: no cash flows, the value is the sloth brand plus that community.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SLOTH or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: SLOTH (Solana) measures $1.94M and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SLOTH or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: SLOTH (Solana) grades A and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SLOTH and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show SLOTH at +14.2% and ZAMA at −16.1%.
More comparisons
CHATOSHI vs SLOTH67 vs SLOTHDJI6930 vs SLOTHTOAD vs SLOTHGM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.