Open app

SLIM vs CLASH — price, size and safety, side by side

SLIM (Solana) vs CLASH (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.

SLIMA

$0.005036
Solanium on Solana
Trade SLIM
vs

CLASHA

$0.00951
ClashProject on Solana
Trade CLASH

SLIM vs CLASH — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18

100 — shared start
SLIM +5.12%  ·  CLASH −12.0% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
SLIMCLASH
Price$0.005036$0.00951
Market cap$497.47K$10.00M
24h volume$364.77$29.49K
Liquidity$208.51K$205.55K
FDV$497.47K$10.00M
Holders405,77310,007
Safety gradeAA

Where they differ

What the data says

SLIM

SLIM is a fossil from Solana's first mania, still breathing. Solanium was one of 2021's hot IDO launchpads — the venues that sold allocations in new projects to token-holding members — and SLIM, at mint xxxxa1sKNGwFtw2kFn8XauW9xq8hBZ5kVtcSesTT9fW, was the key that unlocked participation tiers. The launchpad era faded; the holder base it minted did not. As of NexFlow's September 26, 2026 snapshot: 405,773 wallets still hold SLIM, against a market capitalization of roughly $497 thousand. Read that pair again — nearly half a million holders, less than half a million dollars of total value. The average position is worth about a dollar.

Structurally, there's nothing wrong with it, which is its own kind of interesting: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, about $209 thousand of pool liquidity that is actually large relative to the microscopic mcap. Nobody can inflate it, nobody can freeze you, and the exits — for positions this small — clear fine. The checks a scam fails, SLIM passes; it simply also demonstrates that passing them guarantees nothing about value.

Full SLIM safety read →

CLASH

CLASH — ClashProject on Solana, mint 6nR8wBnfsmXfcdDr1hovJKjvFQxNSidN6XFyfAFZpump — is an AI-gaming-themed pump.fun graduate holding $10.0 million of market cap across 10,007 holders in the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with a live site at clashproject.ai and a named X presence.

The number to watch is the dev position: 3.98% of supply in the creator wallet — nearly four cents of every dollar of cap in one address's reach. Against $206 thousand of pool liquidity, that position is roughly 2x the entire exit depth — if it ever moves, the market is the exit liquidity. Disclosed concentration beats hidden bundling, but disclosed is still concentrated.

Full CLASH safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, SLIM or CLASH?

By tracked market cap: SLIM (Solana) measures $497.47K and CLASH (Solana) measures $10.00M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, SLIM or CLASH?

On the contract checks we publish: SLIM (Solana) grades A and CLASH (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have SLIM and CLASH performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show SLIM at +5.12% and CLASH at −12.0%.

More comparisons

TSUKI vs SLIMSLIM vs SCLMAO! vs SLIMHYPE vs SLIMBILLY vs CLASHRHEA vs CLASHPNG vs CLASHCLASH vs ETHFI

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.