NexSHRAMP vs ANAGO — price, size and safety, side by side
SHRAMP (Monad) vs ANAGO (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15T15:15:30 / 2026-11-15T15:15:30.
SHRAMP vs ANAGO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15
| SHRAMP | ANAGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00007932 | $0.00003758 |
| Market cap | $102.13K | $45.13K |
| 24h volume | $349.45 DEX | $1.15K DEX |
| Liquidity | $10.28K | $9.49K |
| FDV | $102.13K | $45.13K |
| Holders | 3,224 | 2,772 |
| Age (days) | 306 | 178 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SHRAMP measures ~2.3× the market cap of ANAGO
- ANAGO measures ~3.3× the 24h volume of SHRAMP
- over the shared window SHRAMP moved −50.1% while ANAGO moved −38.7%
What the data says
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, with 3,224 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $102.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $10.3 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
ANAGO
ANAGO is a three-way fight on Monad, and this deployment is winning it. The ledger holds three tokens sharing the ANAGO ticker — this one, a "Mascot of Monad" variant with 483 holders, and a third simply called Anago with 469 — and the market has sorted them by depth: this deployment carries 2,772 holders and $9 thousand of liquidity, roughly triple the combined base of the other two.
On its own terms the token is a clean Monad meme at 85/100: no mint function, no pause or blacklist, verified source, 163 days old. Liquidity of $9 thousand is deep relative to a market cap of $45 thousand — better than a five-to-one ratio, which is why it won the ticker. The 0x…7777 vanity suffix is the Monad mint-factory signature; it means nothing for safety, just that the deployer paid for a prettier address.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHRAMP or ANAGO?
By tracked market cap: SHRAMP (Monad) measures $102.13K and ANAGO (Monad) measures $45.13K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHRAMP or ANAGO?
On the contract checks we publish: SHRAMP (Monad) grades A and ANAGO (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHRAMP and ANAGO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15, the measured snapshots show SHRAMP at −50.1% and ANAGO at −38.7%.
More comparisons
SHRAMP vs WEETHCAKE vs SHRAMPSHRAMP vs RETHSHRAMP vs NODAANAGO vs WEETHANAGO vs RETHCAKE vs ANAGOANAGO vs NODA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.