HostSHRAMP vs ANAGO — price, size and safety, side by side
SHRAMP (Monad) vs ANAGO (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
SHRAMP vs ANAGO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SHRAMP | ANAGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0002294 | $0.00006851 |
| Market cap | $159.06K | $61.32K |
| 24h volume | $984.90 | $483.38 |
| Liquidity | $17.43K | $13.35K |
| FDV | $159.06K | $61.32K |
| Holders | 3,228 | 2,774 |
| Age (days) | 291 | 163 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SHRAMP measures ~2.6× the market cap of ANAGO
- SHRAMP measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of ANAGO
- over the shared window SHRAMP moved +44.2% while ANAGO moved +11.7%
What the data says
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 3,228 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $159.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $17.4 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
ANAGO
ANAGO clears the most important contract test cleanly. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Neither lever existing is the main reason ANAGO's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-26).
On the trading data, ANAGO shows deep liquidity of $13.35K, a holder base of 2,774 and a maturing record at 163 days as of 2026-09-26. Encouragingly, that $13.35K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $61.32K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 2,774 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHRAMP or ANAGO?
By tracked market cap: SHRAMP (Monad) measures $159.06K and ANAGO (Monad) measures $61.32K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHRAMP or ANAGO?
On the contract checks we publish: SHRAMP (Monad) grades A and ANAGO (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHRAMP and ANAGO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SHRAMP at +44.2% and ANAGO at +11.7%.
More comparisons
SHRAMP vs LENNYRMDN vs SHRAMPARIA vs SHRAMPSLEAZE vs SHRAMPANAGO vs CATBATANITA vs ANAGOANAGO vs CIRCLEANAGO vs POPFROG
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.