HostSDAI vs MU — price, size and safety, side by side
SDAI (Ethereum) vs MU (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
SDAI vs MU — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| SDAI | MU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.18 | $1.09K |
| Market cap | $1.34B | $4.07M |
| 24h volume | $1.78M | $3.62M |
| Liquidity | $5.42M | $5.23M |
| FDV | $165.01M | $4.07M |
| Holders | 3,634 | 4,907 |
| Age (days) | 932 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- SDAI measures ~329× the market cap of MU
- MU measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of SDAI
- over the shared window SDAI moved 0.00% while MU moved +5.62%
What the data says
SDAI
sDAI is Savings Dai — DAI locked in Maker's DAI Savings Rate contract and returned as a share that appreciates against the stablecoin it wraps, DeFi's oldest "your dollar pays you" mechanism. The deployment 0x83f20f44975d03b1b09e64809b757c47f942beea is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $5.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: sDAI's yield is Maker protocol revenue — real lending income distributed to savers, which is why the DSR survived when incentive-printed yields didn't — but the rate is governance-set, so the "savings rate" can be and has been dialed to near-zero when the DAO wanted it there. It is a policy rate, not a market one.
MU
MU is the Micron Technology xStock — a tokenized claim on the US memory-chip maker's equity, part of the Backpack Securities xStocks family that wraps public shares for on-chain trading. The mint MUxEsUKSMACyw5fZf68wxf5FLnZVhtU9CwH8uNNGay1 is the Solana deployment; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $5.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest frame is the shared xStocks one: a claim on custodied shares routed through the wrapper's terms — the equity exposure is real, and so are the 24/7-vs-market-hours gap risk and the wrapper's own counterparty layer. Micron's AI-memory thesis is what the token ultimately tracks; the wrapper is just how it reaches the chain.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SDAI or MU?
By tracked market cap: SDAI (Ethereum) measures $1.34B and MU (Solana) measures $4.07M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SDAI or MU?
On the contract checks we publish: SDAI (Ethereum) grades B and MU (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SDAI and MU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show SDAI at 0.00% and MU at +5.62%.
More comparisons
FLOKI vs SDAISDAI vs STLINKUSD0++ vs SDAISDAI vs ZECMU vs LONGZEC vs MUMU vs ONYCMU vs POPCAT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.