HostSCF vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
SCF (Solana) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
SCF vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SCF | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0005027 | $0.09075 |
| Market cap | $488.53K | $245.37M |
| 24h volume | $2.38K | $7.04M |
| Liquidity | $127.64K | $313.10K |
| FDV | $488.53K | $22.90M |
| Holders | 23,231 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | — | 234 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~502× the market cap of SCF
- ZAMA measures ~2.5× the liquidity of SCF
- ZAMA measures ~2,959× the 24h volume of SCF
- SCF measures ~6.6× the holder count of ZAMA
- over the shared window SCF moved +5.56% while ZAMA moved −9.55%
What the data says
SCF
SCF — Smoking Chicken Fish on Solana, mint GiG7Hr61RVm4CSUxJmgiCoySFQtdiwxtqf64MsRppump — is one of the strangest surviving memes of the cycle — an absurdist chicken-fish cult that spawned a real community, a church-themed website, and 23,231 holders on $489 thousand of market cap in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
~$17 of cap per wallet — the widest retail distribution in this cohort — and smokingchickenfish.xyz still live. The counterweight is the book: ~$346 of daily volume on $128 thousand of liquidity is a nearly frozen market — twenty-three thousand holders, essentially none trading.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SCF or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: SCF (Solana) measures $488.53K and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SCF or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: SCF (Solana) grades A and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SCF and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SCF at +5.56% and ZAMA at −9.55%.
More comparisons
SCF vs HABITATRFC vs SCFSCF vs DUSDSCF vs SOLANGELESGM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.