HostRNT vs FUN — price, size and safety, side by side
RNT (Polygon) vs FUN (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
RNT vs FUN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| RNT | FUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3566 | $3.42 |
| Market cap | $50.74M | — |
| 24h volume | $20.73K all venues | $19.94K DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.67M | $1.97M |
| FDV | $70.58M | $172.10M |
| Holders | 4,666 | 31,265 |
| Age (days) | 1,064 | 121 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- FUN measures ~6.7× the holder count of RNT
- over the shared window RNT moved +14.1% while FUN moved −57.3%
What the data says
RNT
RNT at 0x27ab6e82f3458edbc0703db2756391b899ce6324 — the Reental Utility Token — is a long-running Polygon asset: 1,064 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $50.7 million market cap with a $70.6 million fully-diluted figure on 199.8 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is one of the healthier shapes in this index: $2.7 million of tracked depth is deep relative to the cap, though the $15.0 thousand daily volume is quiet — an asset held more than it is flipped. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority question belongs to the live scan.
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $172.1 million market cap against $2.0 million of tracked pool liquidity on the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RNT or FUN?
By tracked market cap: RNT (Polygon) measures $50.74M and FUN (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RNT or FUN?
On the contract checks we publish: RNT (Polygon) grades B and FUN (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RNT and FUN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show RNT at +14.1% and FUN at −57.3%.
More comparisons
ARB vs RNTRNT vs PENDLERNT vs PENGURNT vs SHIBSYRUPUSDC vs FUNFUN vs USDTCBETH vs FUNFUN vs USD0
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.