HostRNT vs ATH — price, size and safety, side by side
RNT (Polygon) vs ATH (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
RNT vs ATH — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| RNT | ATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3566 | $20.73 |
| Market cap | $50.74M | — |
| 24h volume | $20.73K all venues | $95.69K DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.67M | $1.28M |
| FDV | $70.58M | $48.25M |
| Holders | 4,666 | 25,673 |
| Age (days) | 1,064 | 134 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RNT measures ~2.1× the liquidity of ATH
- ATH measures ~4.6× the 24h volume of RNT
- ATH measures ~5.5× the holder count of RNT
- over the shared window RNT moved +14.1% while ATH moved +1.84%
What the data says
RNT
RNT at 0x27ab6e82f3458edbc0703db2756391b899ce6324 — the Reental Utility Token — is a long-running Polygon asset: 1,064 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $50.7 million market cap with a $70.6 million fully-diluted figure on 199.8 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is one of the healthier shapes in this index: $2.7 million of tracked depth is deep relative to the cap, though the $15.0 thousand daily volume is quiet — an asset held more than it is flipped. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority question belongs to the live scan.
ATH
ATH — 0x6b998441f7349a7bfdbb2a6d61a6d5f9acb90de8 — is the Aegis token on Polygon, a ticket that carries the Greek word for shield. At 116 days old it is past the newborn phase where most tokens in this ledger die.
The November 4, 2026 snapshot reads $1.3 million of tracked pool depth and 25,673 holders against a fully diluted valuation of $48.3 million — the market-cap field is empty in this read, so FDV is the honest size figure. Unit price prints near $20.39, down a fraction of a percent on the day.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RNT or ATH?
By tracked market cap: RNT (Polygon) measures $50.74M and ATH (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RNT or ATH?
On the contract checks we publish: RNT (Polygon) grades B and ATH (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RNT and ATH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show RNT at +14.1% and ATH at +1.84%.
More comparisons
ARB vs RNTRNT vs PENDLERNT vs PENGURNT vs SHIBATH vs QNTONDO vs ATHMORPHO vs ATHATH vs LIT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.