HostRFC vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
RFC (Solana) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
RFC vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RFC | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0005034 | $0.09075 |
| Market cap | $525.96K | $245.37M |
| 24h volume | $33.75K | $7.04M |
| Liquidity | $127.90K | $313.10K |
| FDV | $525.96K | $22.90M |
| Holders | 11,633 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | — | 234 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~467× the market cap of RFC
- ZAMA measures ~2.4× the liquidity of RFC
- ZAMA measures ~209× the 24h volume of RFC
- RFC measures ~3.3× the holder count of ZAMA
- over the shared window RFC moved +25.9% while ZAMA moved −9.55%
What the data says
RFC
RFC starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The mint authority has been renounced, so the supply is fixed and no one can dilute it, and with freeze also off, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. That's why RFC sits comfortably at 92/100 as of 2026-09-26 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
On the market side, RFC brings a $127.90K pool and a holder base of 11,633 as of 2026-09-26. Encouragingly, that $127.90K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $525.96K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 11,633 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — 0.39% of supply as of 2026-09-26, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RFC or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: RFC (Solana) measures $525.96K and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RFC or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: RFC (Solana) grades A and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RFC and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RFC at +25.9% and ZAMA at −9.55%.
More comparisons
RFC vs SCFRFC vs HABITATFRAX vs RFCRFC vs DUSDGM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.