HostRETH vs MOR — price, size and safety, side by side
RETH (Ethereum) vs MOR (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
RETH vs MOR — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RETH | MOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.14K | $1.57 |
| Market cap | $1.00B | $14.23M |
| 24h volume | $1.27M | $6.99K |
| Liquidity | $11.93M | $573.09K |
| FDV | $1.00B | $4.55M |
| Holders | 21,817 | 5,054 |
| Age (days) | 1,492 | 866 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RETH measures ~70× the market cap of MOR
- RETH measures ~21× the liquidity of MOR
- RETH measures ~182× the 24h volume of MOR
- RETH measures ~4.3× the holder count of MOR
- over the shared window RETH moved −0.82% while MOR moved +4.76%
What the data says
RETH
rETH is Rocket Pool's liquid staking receipt — the decentralized alternative in the ETH-staking market: anyone can run a Rocket Pool "minipool" validator with 8 ETH plus RPL collateral, and rETH appreciates against ETH as rewards accrue. The contract 0xae78736cd615f374d3085123a210448e74fc6393 is the canonical deployment; our September 26, 2026 read shows $11.9 million of tracked pool liquidity, with rETH's deeper venues spread across the wider DeFi stack.
The honest framing: rETH's pitch is credible neutrality — a permissionless operator set rather than one company's validators — and the trade-off is the usual one: a smaller, more fragmented liquidity surface than stETH and its own smart-contract surface (minipool mechanics, oracle DAO) instead of a single issuer's operations. The wrapper price is not ETH's price — it floats on its own exchange rate and has traded at discounts in stress.
MOR
MOR at 0x092baadb7def4c3981454dd9c0a0d7ff07bcfc86 is the Morpheus token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized AI-compute network, 866 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $14.2 million market cap sits above the $4.6 million fully-diluted figure on 3.2 million units — an inversion where the priced float exceeds the measured local supply basis.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, it cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The book is compact: 5,054 holders with the ten largest wallets at 71.3% of supply, and $573.1 thousand of workable tracked depth on $13.5 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RETH or MOR?
By tracked market cap: RETH (Ethereum) measures $1.00B and MOR (Arbitrum) measures $14.23M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RETH or MOR?
On the contract checks we publish: RETH (Ethereum) grades B and MOR (Arbitrum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RETH and MOR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RETH at −0.82% and MOR at +4.76%.
More comparisons
DIEM vs RETHUSDG vs RETHRETH vs SYRUPUSDCRETH vs WETHFBOMB vs MORPROS vs MORMOR vs TRUNKMOR vs B2
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.