HostRETH vs JUPSOL — price, size and safety, side by side
RETH (Ethereum) vs JUPSOL (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-31 / 2026-10-31.
RETH vs JUPSOL — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-10-31T21:16:17
| RETH | JUPSOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.65K | $116.14 |
| Market cap | $1.00B | $624.49M |
| 24h volume | $1.77M DEX | $2.98M DEX |
| Liquidity | $12.13M | — |
| FDV | $1.00B | $624.49M |
| Holders | 21,853 | 33,050 |
| Age (days) | 1,507 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RETH measures ~1.6× the market cap of JUPSOL
- JUPSOL measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of RETH
- JUPSOL measures ~1.5× the holder count of RETH
What the data says
RETH
rETH is Rocket Pool's liquid staking receipt — the decentralized alternative in the ETH-staking market: anyone can run a Rocket Pool "minipool" validator with 8 ETH plus RPL collateral, and rETH appreciates against ETH as rewards accrue. The contract 0xae78736cd615f374d3085123a210448e74fc6393 is the canonical deployment; our October 6, 2026 read shows $12.1 million of tracked pool liquidity, with rETH's deeper venues spread across the wider DeFi stack.
The honest framing: rETH's pitch is credible neutrality — a permissionless operator set rather than one company's validators — and the trade-off is the usual one: a smaller, more fragmented liquidity surface than stETH and its own smart-contract surface (minipool mechanics, oracle DAO) instead of a single issuer's operations. The wrapper price is not ETH's price — it floats on its own exchange rate and has traded at discounts in stress.
JUPSOL
JupSOL exists because Jupiter wanted its own validator to win, and offered stakers a clean bribe to help: zero fees. Stake SOL through Jupiter and the resulting jupSOL — mint jupSoLaHXQiZZTSfEWMTRRgpnyFm8f6sZdosWBjx93v — accrues validator rewards with Jupiter taking no cut, plus the MEV earnings of the Jupiter validator the stake supports. The pitch worked: the October 6, 2026 snapshot shows roughly $624.5 million staked across 33,050 holders, making it one of the largest single-validator stake pools on the chain.
"Single-validator" is the phrase to sit with. Most large LSTs spread stake across dozens or hundreds of validators; jupSOL concentrates it on Jupiter's. For the holder, the practical risks barely change — delegated stake can't be stolen by a validator, and downtime costs missed rewards rather than principal — but at network scale, popular single-validator pools nudge Solana's stake toward concentration, a trade-off the ecosystem debates in good faith. You get the best economics on the chain; the chain gets a slightly heavier validator.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RETH or JUPSOL?
By tracked market cap: RETH (Ethereum) measures $1.00B and JUPSOL (Solana) measures $624.49M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RETH or JUPSOL?
On the contract checks we publish: RETH (Ethereum) grades B and JUPSOL (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RETH and JUPSOL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-10-31T21:16:17, the measured snapshots show RETH at −9.92% and JUPSOL at −6.89%.
More comparisons
AAVE vs RETHRETH vs USDTBUSDG vs RETHXAUT vs RETHJUPSOL vs BNSOLJUPSOL vs JITOSOLJUPSOL vs JLUSDCWEETH vs JUPSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-10-31T21:16:17; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.