NexRETH vs GMX — price, size and safety, side by side
RETH (Ethereum) vs GMX (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-14.
RETH vs GMX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| RETH | GMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.35K | $7.09 |
| Market cap | $807.34M | $91.09M |
| 24h volume | $62.88K all venues | $3.96M all venues |
| Liquidity | $8.39M | $357.56K |
| FDV | $807.34M | $93.57M |
| Holders | 21,853 | 297,710 |
| Age (days) | 1,507 | 212 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- RETH measures ~8.9× the market cap of GMX
- RETH measures ~23× the liquidity of GMX
- GMX measures ~63× the 24h volume of RETH
- GMX measures ~14× the holder count of RETH
- over the shared window RETH moved −25.9% while GMX moved −6.76%
What the data says
RETH
rETH is Rocket Pool's liquid staking receipt — the decentralized alternative in the ETH-staking market: anyone can run a Rocket Pool "minipool" validator with 8 ETH plus RPL collateral, and rETH appreciates against ETH as rewards accrue. The contract 0xae78736cd615f374d3085123a210448e74fc6393 is the canonical deployment; our November 6, 2026 read shows $8.4 million of tracked pool liquidity, with rETH's deeper venues spread across the wider DeFi stack.
The honest framing: rETH's pitch is credible neutrality — a permissionless operator set rather than one company's validators — and the trade-off is the usual one: a smaller, more fragmented liquidity surface than stETH and its own smart-contract surface (minipool mechanics, oracle DAO) instead of a single issuer's operations. The wrapper price is not ETH's price — it floats on its own exchange rate and has traded at discounts in stress.
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices an $91.1 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $93.6 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $358 thousand of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RETH or GMX?
By tracked market cap: RETH (Ethereum) measures $807.34M and GMX (Arbitrum) measures $91.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RETH or GMX?
On the contract checks we publish: RETH (Ethereum) grades B and GMX (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RETH and GMX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show RETH at −25.9% and GMX at −6.76%.
More comparisons
RETH vs SKYRETH vs KBTCSUSDAI vs RETHRETH vs USDCGMX vs CRVGMX vs GOHOMEMON vs GMXGMX vs VIRTUAL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.