HostRETH vs AAVE — price, size and safety, side by side
RETH (Ethereum) vs AAVE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
RETH vs AAVE — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RETH | AAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.14K | $155.43 |
| Market cap | $1.00B | $2.26B |
| 24h volume | $1.27M | $3.93M |
| Liquidity | $11.93M | $23.28M |
| FDV | $1.00B | $2.34B |
| Holders | 21,817 | 188,683 |
| Age (days) | 1,492 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- AAVE measures ~2.3× the market cap of RETH
- AAVE measures ~2.0× the liquidity of RETH
- AAVE measures ~3.1× the 24h volume of RETH
- AAVE measures ~8.6× the holder count of RETH
- over the shared window RETH moved +7.01% while AAVE moved +17.9%
What the data says
RETH
rETH is Rocket Pool's liquid staking receipt — the decentralized alternative in the ETH-staking market: anyone can run a Rocket Pool "minipool" validator with 8 ETH plus RPL collateral, and rETH appreciates against ETH as rewards accrue. The contract 0xae78736cd615f374d3085123a210448e74fc6393 is the canonical deployment; our September 26, 2026 read shows $11.9 million of tracked pool liquidity, with rETH's deeper venues spread across the wider DeFi stack.
The honest framing: rETH's pitch is credible neutrality — a permissionless operator set rather than one company's validators — and the trade-off is the usual one: a smaller, more fragmented liquidity surface than stETH and its own smart-contract surface (minipool mechanics, oracle DAO) instead of a single issuer's operations. The wrapper price is not ETH's price — it floats on its own exchange rate and has traded at discounts in stress.
AAVE
AAVE is the token of DeFi's biggest lending protocol — the asset that secures Aave's safety module and governs the money market that's been clearing loans continuously since ETHLend in 2017. The deployment 0x7fc66500c84a76ad7e9c93437bfc5ac33e2ddae9 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $23.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — thin against a float that trades everywhere.
The honest shape: AAVE's thesis is unusually concrete for a governance token — stakers backstop protocol shortfalls with their own stake, so the token is literally collateral for the system's solvency, which ties its value to Aave's actual revenue and risk book rather than pure governance vibes. That makes it closer to a productive asset than most of this index — with the caveat that "productive" here still means "exposed to one protocol's loan book."
FAQ
Which is bigger, RETH or AAVE?
By tracked market cap: RETH (Ethereum) measures $1.00B and AAVE (Ethereum) measures $2.26B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RETH or AAVE?
On the contract checks we publish: RETH (Ethereum) grades B and AAVE (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RETH and AAVE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RETH at +7.01% and AAVE at +17.9%.
More comparisons
DIEM vs RETHUSDG vs RETHRETH vs SYRUPUSDCRETH vs WETHUSD1 vs AAVELINK vs AAVEETH vs AAVESUSDE vs AAVE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.