HostRDNT vs GRT — price, size and safety, side by side
RDNT (Arbitrum) vs GRT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
RDNT vs GRT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RDNT | GRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004521 | $0.0281 |
| Market cap | $688.76K | $307.50M |
| 24h volume | $1.39K | $30.30K |
| Liquidity | $61.05K | $60.60K |
| FDV | $459.55K | $94.73M |
| Holders | 101,322 | 119,699 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,325 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- GRT measures ~446× the market cap of RDNT
- GRT measures ~22× the 24h volume of RDNT
- over the shared window RDNT moved −5.68% while GRT moved +19.4%
What the data says
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $688.8 thousand market cap across 101,322 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $61.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
GRT
GRT at 0x9623063377ad1b27544c965ccd7342f7ea7e88c7 — Graph Token — is the Arbitrum deployment of The Graph protocol's indexing-work asset, 1,325 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $307.5 million market cap sits well above the $94.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 3.4 billion local units.
The local book is thin for the headline's scale: $60.6 thousand of tracked depth on $42.1 thousand of 24-hour volume — a layer-two slice where the protocol's real settlement happens through indexer economics, not the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RDNT or GRT?
By tracked market cap: RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $688.76K and GRT (Arbitrum) measures $307.50M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RDNT or GRT?
On the contract checks we publish: RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C and GRT (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RDNT and GRT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RDNT at −5.68% and GRT at +19.4%.
More comparisons
ETHFI vs RDNTEXA vs RDNTRDNT vs 114514RDNT vs GIKOWCT vs GRTGRT vs 我的刀盾GRT vs GHOSTGIKO vs GRT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.