NexRDNT vs ATH — price, size and safety, side by side
RDNT (Arbitrum) vs ATH (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
RDNT vs ATH — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| RDNT | ATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004275 | $20.73 |
| Market cap | $647.15K | — |
| 24h volume | $19.13K all venues | $95.69K DEX |
| Liquidity | $56.03K | $1.28M |
| FDV | $463.35K | $48.25M |
| Holders | 101,328 | 25,673 |
| Age (days) | 1,216 | 134 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- ATH measures ~23× the liquidity of RDNT
- ATH measures ~5.0× the 24h volume of RDNT
- RDNT measures ~3.9× the holder count of ATH
- over the shared window RDNT moved −10.8% while ATH moved +1.84%
What the data says
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $647.2 thousand market cap across 101,328 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $56.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
ATH
ATH — 0x6b998441f7349a7bfdbb2a6d61a6d5f9acb90de8 — is the Aegis token on Polygon, a ticket that carries the Greek word for shield. At 116 days old it is past the newborn phase where most tokens in this ledger die.
The November 4, 2026 snapshot reads $1.3 million of tracked pool depth and 25,673 holders against a fully diluted valuation of $48.3 million — the market-cap field is empty in this read, so FDV is the honest size figure. Unit price prints near $20.39, down a fraction of a percent on the day.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RDNT or ATH?
By tracked market cap: RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $647.15K and ATH (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RDNT or ATH?
On the contract checks we publish: RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C and ATH (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RDNT and ATH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show RDNT at −10.8% and ATH at +1.84%.
More comparisons
RDNT vs TSATRDNT vs POLUNI vs RDNTLINK.E vs RDNTATH vs QNTONDO vs ATHMORPHO vs ATHATH vs LIT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.