HostRDNT vs ATH — price, size and safety, side by side
RDNT (Arbitrum) vs ATH (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
RDNT vs ATH — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RDNT | ATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004521 | $20.39 |
| Market cap | $688.76K | — |
| 24h volume | $1.39K | $94.45K |
| Liquidity | $61.05K | $1.45M |
| FDV | $459.55K | $34.63M |
| Holders | 101,322 | 25,650 |
| Age (days) | — | 116 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- ATH measures ~24× the liquidity of RDNT
- ATH measures ~68× the 24h volume of RDNT
- RDNT measures ~4.0× the holder count of ATH
- over the shared window RDNT moved −5.68% while ATH moved 0.00%
What the data says
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $688.8 thousand market cap across 101,322 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $61.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
ATH
One detail on ATH didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-27 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where ATH stands today: $1.45M of on-chain liquidity, 25,650 wallets holding and a maturing record at 116 days as of 2026-09-27. Read $1.45M of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 25,650 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ATH holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RDNT or ATH?
By tracked market cap: RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $688.76K and ATH (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RDNT or ATH?
On the contract checks we publish: RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C and ATH (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RDNT and ATH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RDNT at −5.68% and ATH at 0.00%.
More comparisons
ETHFI vs RDNTEXA vs RDNTRDNT vs 114514RDNT vs GIKOATH vs ZENATH vs MKRATH vs TSLAXATH vs TEL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.