NexRDNT vs ANT — price, size and safety, side by side
RDNT (Arbitrum) vs ANT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
RDNT vs ANT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| RDNT | ANT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004275 | $0.0312 |
| Market cap | $647.15K | $10.11M |
| 24h volume | $19.13K all venues | $92.57K all venues |
| Liquidity | $56.03K | $53.47K |
| FDV | $463.35K | $35.06M |
| Holders | 101,328 | 41,570 |
| Age (days) | 1,216 | 587 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- ANT measures ~16× the market cap of RDNT
- ANT measures ~4.8× the 24h volume of RDNT
- RDNT measures ~2.4× the holder count of ANT
What the data says
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $647.2 thousand market cap across 101,328 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $56.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
ANT
ANT at 0xa78d8321b20c4ef90ecd72f2588aa985a4bdb684 — deployed under the name Autonomi — is an Arbitrum asset 587 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The $10.1 million market cap prices under a third of the $35.1 million fully-diluted figure — most of the claim sits outside the priced float.
The local book is thin and the tape quiet: $53.5 thousand of tracked depth on $9.7 thousand of 24-hour volume. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RDNT or ANT?
By tracked market cap: RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $647.15K and ANT (Arbitrum) measures $10.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RDNT or ANT?
On the contract checks we publish: RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C and ANT (Arbitrum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RDNT and ANT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show RDNT at −10.8% and ANT at −7.18%.
More comparisons
RDNT vs TSATRDNT vs POLUNI vs RDNTLINK.E vs RDNTTSAT vs ANTANT vs POLUNI vs ANTLINK.E vs ANT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.